English
Türkçe
The number of implants is only one part of a full-arch plan. Bone distribution, prosthetic design, bite, hygiene access and contingency planning matter more than choosing a number from an advertisement.
The short answer
All-on-4 and All-on-6 are descriptions commonly used for full-arch restorations supported by four or six implants. Neither label is a diagnosis and neither is automatically the right answer. A responsible recommendation follows examination, imaging and joint surgical-prosthetic planning.
What the numbers do and do not tell you
The labels describe a possible implant count, not the complete treatment. They do not tell you implant positions, bone quality, whether grafting is considered, the material of the provisional or final restoration, how the bite will be designed, or whether the planned prosthesis can be cleaned effectively.
Why anatomy and distribution matter
Implants need useful distribution in available bone while respecting anatomical structures. Six implants may offer additional support in some designs, but placing more implants is not automatically safer or feasible. Four well-planned implants may be considered in another situation. Only the treating team can interpret three-dimensional imaging and clinical findings.
Questions about the prosthesis
Ask whether the proposed restoration is fixed or removable by the patient, what provisional stage is expected, what material is proposed for the final restoration, and how repairs would be handled. The plan should also explain hygiene access, professional maintenance and what happens if one implant does not integrate or later becomes compromised.
Risks, alternatives and uncertainty
Full-arch implant treatment involves surgical and prosthetic risks. Infection, healing problems, implant failure, mechanical complications, altered sensation and the need for maintenance or revision should be discussed in the context of your health and anatomy. Alternatives may include preserving treatable teeth, staged rehabilitation, an overdenture or a conventional denture.
How to compare two proposals
Compare the diagnosis, records reviewed, rationale, provider responsibilities, restoration specification, maintenance plan and contingency plan—not just the implant count or package price. If two plans differ, ask each treating provider to explain which finding led to the difference.
How Estelion supports communication
Estelion coordinates enquiries, record transfer, travel communication and contact with an authorised treatment provider. The responsible provider performs the clinical assessment, explains alternatives and risks, obtains consent and delivers any treatment. An initial remote exchange is informational and may change after direct examination.